Agenda for Thursday 1/25/07
The agenda for Thursday's council meeting has been posted. After a long meeting at the beginning of the month, there is little business on this agenda.
There will be presentations from Planning and Zoning and the Board of Adjustments. These boards have been pushing for a regular audience with the council since David Lanman tried to abolish both boards and reorganize them under his buddy Betsy Burns. For some reason, Administrator Sauceda has been unwilling to put them on the agenda until now. Hmmm, David does not like these boards because they don't do his political bidding. If they are unwilling to follow his orders, he wants to neutralize them. Sauceda wants to make Lanman happy because Lanman has illegally authorized Sauceda's 25 percent raise and both his year-end bonuses. So agenda-maker Sauceda has kept them off the agenda for the better part of the year.
Well here they are at the first of the year. This is supposed to be the first in a standing monthly report to council during the second monthly meeting. Let's see if Sauceda stands them up next month.
Perhaps the biggest issue of the Planning and Zoning Board is that they may or may not have a valid zoning map. This issue is one or two years old. There is no reason that council, mayor, administrator and P&Z cannot take care of this major problem immediately. I learned about this problem two years ago. It goes like this. In 2001 or so, council accepted a hand-colored map of Marfa as the official zoning map. Individual lots and blocks are colored in to indicate the appropriate zone. The law required the administrator and/or mayor to sign the map to make it official. This never happened. Years go by with complacency and then confusion about the status of the map. Monte Akers is asked for an opinion. He declares the map good enough, acceptable to use for city business, and says it just lacks a signature. Nobody signs it and another year slips by.
Meanwhile, P&Z has been working on an updated version of the map. I do not know if they finished their coloring yet. Rudy Garcia, former council member and current BoA alternate, has complained frequently that we do not have an official map and therefore we can take no zoning or permitting actions at all. Rudy insists that legal descriptions of the boundaries of the zones also need to be written. These have been written but not formally adopted. At the most recent BoA meeting, Sauceda was informed that all he and Lanman needed to do was sign the map and it would be official. They have refused this opportunity to clear up the matter. Who knows why? One can only guess that Sauceda is following Lanman's desire to have as little structure or organization as possible to help create the mythical "frontier" town of Lanman's dreams. Perhaps he read too many westerns while growing up on the East Coast where he learned his construction trades.
Now I will let you in on a little secret! The only semi-official map of Marfa Zoning hangs in the Casner room. There are no copies. Despite a recent history of losing all records in a city hall fire, a copy of this only map has never been made. Furthermore, it is in an open room with nobody watching it. Do you want to rezone your own property? Easy! Just head on down to the Casner room with an eraser and your crayons and you too can convert your home into a B&B or auto paint shop or shopping mall! So the race is on. Who will get to the map first? Responsible officials or prankster citizens!
Seriously, this is an administrative fiasco. Council took action years ago. The attorney gave his opinion. The mayor has interfered. The administrator has done nothing. This is a paperwork issue. This is a clerical issue. This is an administrative issue. If you read the Zoning Ordinance you will find that all enforcement of zoning is the responsibility of the administrator. Sauceda needs this map to enforce the ordinance. For two years, he has neglected to sign it. He has been informed by BoA, P&Z, citizens, and the attorney. Nada. We got nada from him. While the administrator has failed to do his job, so has council. They have neglected their job of managing their employee, Florencio Sauceda. Sauceda has not acted on the map. He has not placed this on agenda for discussion. Council should demand that Sauceda sign the map, make copies of the map, and keep it in a safe place. When P&Z finishes their new zoning map, it can be adopted to replace this old map.
The BoA presentation should be interesting also. One of the issues that this board is working on has to do with the permit approval process. This is one of those things that falls in one of the many cracks at city hall. Again, Sauceda enforces all zoning issues. Our meager and ignored permits are part of that ordinance. Ultimately, the process for reviewing permit applications and issuing permits is a boring administrative issue. It gets more interesting when you have an administrator that has been bought off by the mayor and a mayor that likes to do illegal construction work, dislikes rules related to construction, and likes to reward his buddies with illegal building permits.
Serious accusations. Here is how the permit process works now. People drop off applications with a $25 fee. They go in a stack in city hall. The mayor peruses the stack. Then he instructs the front office to issue permits that he approves. If he does not approve, he will delay the permit for months. His approval has much to do with people and little to do with law. If he likes the person, they get approved even if they ignore the zoning law. If he dislikes the person, they get stalled even if they follow the zoning law.
The permit application form has a place for the city to fill in "Verified by:" to indicate who reviewed the application. At first, Lanman signed these with his "DL" signature or simply left that line blank. After making many errors on permits, he instructed the front office to start signing his name for him. After more errors, he instructed the office to sign the forms "City of Marfa Administration" or "Marfa City Hall." This is really funny because he is neither the administrator nor the building. Two construction projects in the last month have been done in violation of the zoning ordinance setback rules. The permits were approved by Lanman even though the applications showed setback violations.
The Board of Adjustments is recommending a resolution to council that will formally eliminate the mayor from the permit approval process. The resolution calls for council to create a citizen advisory committee that reports to the administrator. The purpose of the committee is to review the permits with respect to the zoning ordinance and then recommend action to the administrator. The administrator would formally act on the permit by approving, rejecting, or sending back for changes.
Council should strongly endorse this idea of removing a partisan politician from an administrative task to eliminate future permit errors caused by ignorance of the laws or political favoritism.
There are two other agenda items. One involves a $15,000 reimbursement with the Texas DPS. As usual, the administrator has written the most convoluted and confusing agenda description:
DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION-RATIFY/APPROVE INTER-LOCAL COOPERATION CONTRACT OPERATION WRANGLER- DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT/OFFICE OF GOVERNOR-TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY-REIMBURSEMENT (01-22-07-JULY 2007) $15,000
What does this mean? I cannot even figure out if we are the reimburser or reimbursee. I am so tired of this gobbledygook from the administrator. Why does he write unintelligible agenda item descriptions?
The final issue is an agreement to conduct an election with MISD on May 12, 2007. Hallelujah! The first formal mention of the election in May.
Strangely missing is the contract for Sauceda. He got 3.5 votes of confidence at the last meeting. That begs the question: Is a half vote of confidence also a half vote of no confidence? Is the glass half-empty or half-full? Martinez said they would move quickly to give Sauceda another contract. What is going on? Stay tuned!
There will be presentations from Planning and Zoning and the Board of Adjustments. These boards have been pushing for a regular audience with the council since David Lanman tried to abolish both boards and reorganize them under his buddy Betsy Burns. For some reason, Administrator Sauceda has been unwilling to put them on the agenda until now. Hmmm, David does not like these boards because they don't do his political bidding. If they are unwilling to follow his orders, he wants to neutralize them. Sauceda wants to make Lanman happy because Lanman has illegally authorized Sauceda's 25 percent raise and both his year-end bonuses. So agenda-maker Sauceda has kept them off the agenda for the better part of the year.
Well here they are at the first of the year. This is supposed to be the first in a standing monthly report to council during the second monthly meeting. Let's see if Sauceda stands them up next month.
Perhaps the biggest issue of the Planning and Zoning Board is that they may or may not have a valid zoning map. This issue is one or two years old. There is no reason that council, mayor, administrator and P&Z cannot take care of this major problem immediately. I learned about this problem two years ago. It goes like this. In 2001 or so, council accepted a hand-colored map of Marfa as the official zoning map. Individual lots and blocks are colored in to indicate the appropriate zone. The law required the administrator and/or mayor to sign the map to make it official. This never happened. Years go by with complacency and then confusion about the status of the map. Monte Akers is asked for an opinion. He declares the map good enough, acceptable to use for city business, and says it just lacks a signature. Nobody signs it and another year slips by.
Meanwhile, P&Z has been working on an updated version of the map. I do not know if they finished their coloring yet. Rudy Garcia, former council member and current BoA alternate, has complained frequently that we do not have an official map and therefore we can take no zoning or permitting actions at all. Rudy insists that legal descriptions of the boundaries of the zones also need to be written. These have been written but not formally adopted. At the most recent BoA meeting, Sauceda was informed that all he and Lanman needed to do was sign the map and it would be official. They have refused this opportunity to clear up the matter. Who knows why? One can only guess that Sauceda is following Lanman's desire to have as little structure or organization as possible to help create the mythical "frontier" town of Lanman's dreams. Perhaps he read too many westerns while growing up on the East Coast where he learned his construction trades.
Now I will let you in on a little secret! The only semi-official map of Marfa Zoning hangs in the Casner room. There are no copies. Despite a recent history of losing all records in a city hall fire, a copy of this only map has never been made. Furthermore, it is in an open room with nobody watching it. Do you want to rezone your own property? Easy! Just head on down to the Casner room with an eraser and your crayons and you too can convert your home into a B&B or auto paint shop or shopping mall! So the race is on. Who will get to the map first? Responsible officials or prankster citizens!
Seriously, this is an administrative fiasco. Council took action years ago. The attorney gave his opinion. The mayor has interfered. The administrator has done nothing. This is a paperwork issue. This is a clerical issue. This is an administrative issue. If you read the Zoning Ordinance you will find that all enforcement of zoning is the responsibility of the administrator. Sauceda needs this map to enforce the ordinance. For two years, he has neglected to sign it. He has been informed by BoA, P&Z, citizens, and the attorney. Nada. We got nada from him. While the administrator has failed to do his job, so has council. They have neglected their job of managing their employee, Florencio Sauceda. Sauceda has not acted on the map. He has not placed this on agenda for discussion. Council should demand that Sauceda sign the map, make copies of the map, and keep it in a safe place. When P&Z finishes their new zoning map, it can be adopted to replace this old map.
The BoA presentation should be interesting also. One of the issues that this board is working on has to do with the permit approval process. This is one of those things that falls in one of the many cracks at city hall. Again, Sauceda enforces all zoning issues. Our meager and ignored permits are part of that ordinance. Ultimately, the process for reviewing permit applications and issuing permits is a boring administrative issue. It gets more interesting when you have an administrator that has been bought off by the mayor and a mayor that likes to do illegal construction work, dislikes rules related to construction, and likes to reward his buddies with illegal building permits.
Serious accusations. Here is how the permit process works now. People drop off applications with a $25 fee. They go in a stack in city hall. The mayor peruses the stack. Then he instructs the front office to issue permits that he approves. If he does not approve, he will delay the permit for months. His approval has much to do with people and little to do with law. If he likes the person, they get approved even if they ignore the zoning law. If he dislikes the person, they get stalled even if they follow the zoning law.
The permit application form has a place for the city to fill in "Verified by:" to indicate who reviewed the application. At first, Lanman signed these with his "DL" signature or simply left that line blank. After making many errors on permits, he instructed the front office to start signing his name for him. After more errors, he instructed the office to sign the forms "City of Marfa Administration" or "Marfa City Hall." This is really funny because he is neither the administrator nor the building. Two construction projects in the last month have been done in violation of the zoning ordinance setback rules. The permits were approved by Lanman even though the applications showed setback violations.
The Board of Adjustments is recommending a resolution to council that will formally eliminate the mayor from the permit approval process. The resolution calls for council to create a citizen advisory committee that reports to the administrator. The purpose of the committee is to review the permits with respect to the zoning ordinance and then recommend action to the administrator. The administrator would formally act on the permit by approving, rejecting, or sending back for changes.
Council should strongly endorse this idea of removing a partisan politician from an administrative task to eliminate future permit errors caused by ignorance of the laws or political favoritism.
There are two other agenda items. One involves a $15,000 reimbursement with the Texas DPS. As usual, the administrator has written the most convoluted and confusing agenda description:
DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION-RATIFY/APPROVE INTER-LOCAL COOPERATION CONTRACT OPERATION WRANGLER- DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT/OFFICE OF GOVERNOR-TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY-REIMBURSEMENT (01-22-07-JULY 2007) $15,000
What does this mean? I cannot even figure out if we are the reimburser or reimbursee. I am so tired of this gobbledygook from the administrator. Why does he write unintelligible agenda item descriptions?
The final issue is an agreement to conduct an election with MISD on May 12, 2007. Hallelujah! The first formal mention of the election in May.
Strangely missing is the contract for Sauceda. He got 3.5 votes of confidence at the last meeting. That begs the question: Is a half vote of confidence also a half vote of no confidence? Is the glass half-empty or half-full? Martinez said they would move quickly to give Sauceda another contract. What is going on? Stay tuned!
14 Comments:
Rob, you are, as usual, right on.
This deliberate stonewalling on the permitting process should be considered criminal, but we know that nothing Flo and Lanman do or don't do classifies as criminal.
I want to know what happened to the Resolution that council member Mary Williams was going to put on the agenda. Oscar knew about it. What happened to it? Let us guess. Oscar didn't plan to be here so no go with something sticky like this resolution. Flo and Lanman control the agenda. They still refuse to acknowledge that a councilmember has the right to put something on the agenda.
I was curious as well about the obfuscation regarding Operation Wrangler. come to find out, it was on the January agenda of the Rio Grande Council of Governments but I could not find any info. I happened across a description of it whilst in the DMN website (which I put under your last article). I checked with the Sheriff's Office and the Marfa PD. The PD is aware of the $15,000. It is to be used for overtime work done for Operation Wrangler. It has to do with illegal alien activity, specifically transportation of aliens, illegal entry, transportation of drugs or currency, WMD, crimes against aliens, border crossing by gang members or organized crime, use of stash or safe houses, any border related criminal activity or significant incidents occuring in the city or county, not just in Operation Wrangler or Operation Linebacker.
Blogger Election Watchdogs, from the Secretary of State Election Division. Let us all keep track of how many times Flo has to call Monte to get information that is on this calendar.
May 12, 2007 - Uniform Election Date
Authority conducting elections *Most local political subdivisions
**First Day to file for Place on Ballot February 10, 2007
**Last Day to file for place on Ballot March 12, 2007(deadline is extended to next business day)
Last Day to Order General Election March 12, 2007(deadline is extended to next business day)
First Day to Apply for Ballot by Mail March 13, 2007
Last Day to Register to Vote April 12, 2007
First Day of Early Voting April 30, 2007
Last Day to Apply for Ballot by Mail (received not Postmarked) May 4, 2007 (May 5th is the 7th day, but deadline moves to preceding business day, Friday)
Last Day of Early Voting May 8, 2007
November 6, 2007 - Uniform Election Date
Authority conducting elections County Clerk/Elections Administrator
*Local political subdivisions
**First Day to file for Place on General Election Ballot (for cities and schools ONLY) (filing deadline for other political subdivisions may vary) July 29, 2007
Last Day to Order General Election August 28, 2007
**Last Day to file for Place on General Election Ballot (for local political subdivisions ONLY) August 28, 2007
First Day to Apply for Ballot by Mail September 7, 2007
Last Day to Register to Vote October 9, 2007 (Oct. 7th is 30th day, but deadline moves to next business day, Tuesday, due to Columbus day)
First Day of Early Voting October 22, 2007 (17th day before election day falls on a Saturday, first day moves to next business day)
Last Day to Apply for Ballot by Mail October 30, 2007 (must be received, not merely post marked)
Last Day of Early Voting November 2, 2007
*Local political subdivisions: county local propositions, cities, school districts, water districts, hospital districts, and any other local government that conducts elections. The majority of these elections are conducted on the May uniform election date.
**Filing deadlines. Generally, the filing deadline is the 62nd day prior to election day (70th day prior to November General); however, the Election Code may provide a different special election filing deadline. See Section 201.054 of the Texas Election Code. Local political subdivisions, other than cities or school districts, might not have a "first day" to file. Write-in deadlines for general and special elections also vary, but the deadline is usually on the 5th day after the regular filing deadline for the election
To really bird dog those elections, go here:
http://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/laws/advisory2006-21.shtml
Well, the resolution takes the Mayor out of the mix...no wonder it is not on the agenda!!!!
Remember when Lanman wanted to POOF, like magic, move this MANDATED May 12 election date to November??? This was to accommodate the budget calendar he intends to set so council members wouldn't be elected til November, giving him lo, these many months to train the existing council on budget process?
Is there a remedial canine school for mayors?
My dog objects to that reference to canines.
The permit process resolution is not on the agenda. Mary Williams had agreed to present it to council. Maybe next time. Maybe not. What is the hurry to actually accomplish anything? I am sure BoA will bring it up on Thursday, but no action will be allowed. Inaction seems to be key word for this council, mayor and administrator.
Yes, Lanman wanted to move the election to get the budget done. What a joke! He wasted last summer pursuing his Lanman Legacy Landfill adjacent to the Marfa Grasslands Conservation area. This from the first Green Party mayor elected in Texas! Go Green Party! You really backed a winner.
We will be lucky to get the current budget published by February (4-5 months late). Last year it was published 10 months late. They need to start working on next year's budget in May to get it done in September.
If Budget Officer Lanman and Sauceda had thier way, we would be dealing with an election in November and still working on next year's budget in November! How do these two guys even dress themselves in the morning?
Looked at the agenda. No wonder P&Z and BOA were put on. Without them it wouldn't fill a page! There is nothing that they need to discuss, everything is fine. Words would fail to describe my frustration.
Rob,
I agree agenda items need to be written in plain understandable items. Perhaps, Sauceda gets assistance from the City Attorney.
Rob,
I agree agenda items need to be written in plain understandable language. Perhaps, Sauceda gets assistance from the City Attorney in writing them.
There is actually a rule or law stipulating that agenda items have to be very precise and illuminative so as to give the public a CLEAR picture of what will be addressed. Comes from the Open Meetings Act, I believe. Oh, but pish posh, a state law again skirted? Exactly what is Flo good for? He can't do numbers, he can't read, he can't write. I believe the only thing he can do is dress himself in the morning! Lanman, another story. How hard is it to appear as the figure head of the city looking like the painter in the old Murphy Brown series? Except that guy had hair.
Hey Rob, speaking of the Green Party...What was Lanman's reference to Tom Greenwood at the last meeting? "so progressive, green." What the hell does that mean?
I remember those heady days of the Legacy Landfill...yeah, over the acquifers, on earthquake faults. Another impeccably researched project brought to you by the City of Marfa.
Stay tuned for the recycling project.
I apologize for insulting your dog's intelligence! That was insensitive in the extreme. Plus he is a good looking fellow! And looks so much better in the street in front of the Courthouse than Lanman did when he posed for his official photo as Mayor of Marfa. Why in front of the Courthouse and not city hall?
Post a Comment
<< Home